mercredi 31 janvier 2007

January 31, 2007

Wall Street Finds a Lot to Like About Tobacco

There are plenty of reasons cigarettes would seem to be a terrible business.

The number of American smokers usually drops about 1 or 2 percent a year. Government agencies keep adding cigarette taxes and outlawing smoking in restaurants, workplaces and even on public sidewalks. And tobacco companies continue to pay billions of dollars in legal settlements, money that is used in part to produce antismoking ads.

For all the industry’s apparent troubles, however, the future of cigarettes appears to be brighter than ever.

That at least is the message investors are sending as the Altria Group — the company once known as Philip Morris and the maker of the world’s most popular cigarette, Marlboro — prepares to split itself by spinning off its Kraft Foods division to shareholders and become, once again, primarily a tobacco company. Today, Louis C. Camilleri, the chief executive of Altria, is expected to set a timetable for completing the spinoff.

It is a move that Wall Street is responding to with the equivalent of a standing ovation, but it is not because Kraft Foods, the world’s second-largest food company, after Nestlé, will finally shed the taint of tobacco.

Investors are glad that Altria will finally be rid of Kraft Foods, the maker of Oreo cookies, Velveeta and Tang. Since October, when the company announced its plan for the move, its shares have risen 10 percent.

“Something that is forgotten in all of this is people like to smoke,” said David Adelman, an analyst at Morgan Stanley, who noted that United States tobacco stocks have beaten the Standard & Poor’s 500-stock index in each of the last six years. “It’s enjoyable and there’s not an alternative product.”

He added: “If frozen dinners get too expensive, people will try something else. That’s not true with cigarettes — you are not up at night worried about that product that is going to make cigarettes obsolete.”

In the five and a half years since Altria sold 280 million shares of Kraft at $31 each in an initial public offering, the stock has remained relatively unchanged, closing yesterday at $34.83. Altria owns 88.6 percent of Kraft’s stock.

By contrast, shares of Altria have nearly doubled during that period, moving from $47 to yesterday’s price of $87.54.

It is a remarkable turnabout, considering that in late 2001, Philip Morris announced its plan to change its name to the Altria Group (drawn from the Latin word altus, meaning high, to suggest high performance). At the time, executives said the name change was intended to reduce the damage to the company’s reputation that cigarettes were causing, reflected in the long-depressed share price at the time.

Now, it is Kraft that is seen by many investors as a hindrance to the company.

Why is Wall Street so infatuated with cigarettes? Cigarettes have certain advantages over other consumer products, not the least of which is that they are addictive. They are inexpensive to make, require almost no innovation, there is a global market for them, and cigarette makers can raise prices without seeing much of a drop in business.

On top of all that, a recent string of court decisions has convinced investors that the worst of the litigation against tobacco companies is over.

That, in turn, has allowed Altria to move forward with a revamping that begins with cutting Kraft loose and will ultimately allow Altria to use the huge amounts of cash generated by cigarettes to buy back stock or acquire other tobacco companies, particularly overseas.

“You take away Kraft out of Altria and you are left with a balance sheet that is extremely strong,” said Charles Norton, portfolio manager at the Vice Fund, a mutual fund that invests in tobacco, gambling, alcohol and military contractors. Altria is the fund’s biggest holding. “It’s just a cash cow. The free cash flow on this business is just tremendous.”

The future prospects are particularly attractive in developing countries, where smoking has not yet declined as it has in more developed parts of the world like the United States and Europe.

In China, for instance, the Philip Morris International unit of Altria signed a deal in 2005 that allows it to manufacture and sell Marlboro cigarettes to the country’s 350 million smokers. There are an estimated 1.3 billion smokers worldwide.

But even in the United States, with 45 million smokers, the Philip Morris USA unit of Altria continues to generate sizable profits by raising prices. It also hopes eventually to lure consumers with new tobacco products, including a small tea-bag-like pouch that is smoke-free, spit-free and tucks into the cheek.

It says it is also working on developing cigarettes that are less harmful.

“The exciting part for me,” said Bonnie Herzog, an analyst at Citigroup, “is that tobacco use today will evolve. It’s unlikely that there will ever be a 100 percent safe cigarette, but we feel that a reduced-risk cigarette is on the horizon.”

But some health advocates say that the diminished social acceptability of cigarettes will hurt the long-term prospects of companies like Altria.

“The industry knows that its days of successfully selling their product in this country are limited,” said Dr. David A. Kessler, who called for regulating the tobacco industry as commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration in the 1990s and is now dean of the medical school at the University of California, San Francisco.

“They may be finding favor on Wall Street, but they’re not finding favor in the public arena,” he added. “There are fewer and fewer places that you can go and smoke in public.”

Still, on Wall Street, analysts are much less enthusiastic about the future of an independent Kraft Foods — which makes a wide range of well-known food products — compared with Altria’s prospects.

Kraft has struggled for several years to find its way in a rapidly changing marketplace, and Irene B. Rosenfeld, the chief executive, is expected to lay out her plans for a turnaround next month.

While many analysts say that Kraft is better off without the taint of tobacco, it still faces formidable challenges in repositioning its products at a time when consumers are less loyal to brands and more attracted to natural products, analysts said.

Investors in Altria are expected to get 0.695 share of Kraft for every share of Altria they own, said Ms. Herzog, who predicted that Altria would distribute the shares early in a 120-day period between the announcement and the distribution.

There is, however, a possibility that the distribution could be delayed by a legal challenge.

Michael D. Hausfeld, a lawyer in a pending class-action lawsuit against tobacco companies, said he might file an injunction to stop a spinoff of Kraft. The lawsuit, first filed in 2004 and known as the Schwab case after the lead plaintiff, Barbara Schwab, contends that cigarette manufacturers defrauded consumers by marketing light cigarettes as safer than regular cigarettes.

The idea behind seeking an injunction is that a judgment could be so enormous that Altria might need Kraft — with a market capitalization of $57.25 billion — to pay off the damages.

“Apparently at this point they have decided to spin Kraft off because they believe there’s a diminishment in their legal exposure,” Mr. Hausfeld said. “We disagree. If anything, the light’s fraud presents the strongest legal merit claims against the industry and Philip Morris.”

He estimated that a judgment in the case could be “several hundreds of billions of dollars” because 30 million to 50 million people who smoked light cigarettes made by several different tobacco companies were affected over more than 30 years. Asked to comment on Wall Street’s affection for tobacco stocks, Mr. Hausfeld said: “Wall Street loves money. And cigarettes are money. You are clearly earning huge returns at the expense of people’s lives.”

Several analysts who track Altria have dismissed the chances of an injunction’s success, and in an October conference call with investors, Mr. Camilleri, the Altria chief executive, said, “We believe that such an action would not have merit and that we would ultimately prevail.”

Altria’s plan to spin off Kraft is part of a long-term revamping plan that may ultimately split the domestic and international tobacco businesses into two companies because Altria thinks they would have more value as independent companies.

For example, Philip Morris International would no longer be dragged down by problems associated with smoking in the United States, like diminished demand and government intervention.

“At times, as a tobacco investor or a tobacco analyst, it seems like an unending stream of negative news,” Mr. Adelman of Morgan Stanley said. “You hear about smoking bans, a new piece of legislation. You hear about criticism from the World Health Organization.

“And then lo and behold, manufacturers release their results,” he said. “And they are good.”

Nick Bunkley contributed reporting from Detroit.


url:http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/31/business/31tobacco.html?hp&ex=1170306000&en=dd704550f8368d4d&ei=5094&partner=homepage

lundi 29 janvier 2007

anuary 9, 2007
Essay

Yet Another Worry for Those Who Believe the Glass Is Half-Empty

Now, it seems, pessimists may really have something to worry about: their health.

A study by researchers in the Netherlands has found that people who are temperamentally pessimistic are more likely to die of heart disease and other causes than those who are by nature optimistic.

The study, led by Dr. Erik J. Giltay of the Psychiatric Center GGZ Delfland and published in The Archives of General Psychiatry, followed 941 Dutch subjects, ages 65 to 85, from 1991 to 2001. Subjects were ranked in quartiles as pessimistic or optimistic on the basis of their reactions to statements like, “I still have positive expectations concerning my future” and, “I often feel that life is full of promises.”

Dr. Giltay and his colleagues found that subjects with the highest level of optimism were 45 percent less likely than those with the highest level of pessimism to die of all causes during the study. For those in the quartile with the highest optimism score, the death rate was 30.4 percent; those in the most pessimistic quartile had a death rate of 56.5 percent. There were 397 deaths in the study, and prevention of cardiovascular mortality accounted for nearly half of the protective effects of optimism.

This is the kind of study that worries me. Not personally, though — I’m as optimistic as they come. No, I’m worried about my pessimistic friends and patients who will get hold of this article. After all, if the findings are valid, how much can anyone really do about a gloomy disposition?

Up to this point there has been solid evidence that certain pathological mental states, like depression, are linked with a significantly higher risk of cardiovascular death, but the relationship between normal personality traits like optimism and health have not been as thoroughly studied.

For example, there have been several well-controlled studies showing that depression can as much as double the relative risk of having a first heart attack or dying of heart disease, independent of other factors. And for people who already have well-documented heart disease, depression increases the risk of death about threefold.

But finding a correlation between certain attitudes and health outcomes doesn’t, of course, prove causality. Maybe pessimists have shorter lives because they are sicker to start with than optimists; that may be why they feel bleaker about their future in the first place.

Dr. Giltay carefully controlled for baseline risk factors like blood pressure, cholesterol, smoking and alcohol consumption in his study. Even after controlling for these confounding variables, there was still a significant excess of mortality in the pessimists compared with the optimists. And when he factored in the subjects’ own perception of their health — optimists, not surprisingly, report feeling better — pessimists still had higher morbidity and mortality.

What about the possibility that some of the pessimistic subjects were simply suffering from undiagnosed depression? After all, depression is a strong risk factor for cardiovascular mortality.

Dr. Giltay conceded that the subjects were not psychiatrically screened for depression or any other mental disorder, so this is a possibility. But he said depression was unlikely to explain the correlation between pessimism and mortality.

Perhaps, but we know that depression exists, too, on a spectrum. Mild chronic depressive states like dysthymia could easily masquerade as everyday pessimism, so this study cannot rule out mild depression as a contributor to excess mortality in the pessimistic subjects.

Still, assuming that these findings are replicated and optimism does indeed confer a survival advantage, what mechanism could explain it?

One possibility is that optimists may simply cope better with adversity than pessimists do and engage in behaviors that are more likely to promote health. It is well known, for example, that optimism is strongly associated with seeking social support and coping better with stress. There might even be biological differences between optimistic and pessimistic people that give optimists an edge. This is not so far-fetched if you consider that depression is associated with alterations in many neurotransmitters and hormones like cortisol, which can adversely affect physical health.

At this point, pessimism in the absence of clinical depression is not considered a disease or a risk factor for developing one. But if these data are replicated, perhaps it should be. If that’s the case, then trials of optimism-enhancing treatments, including psychotherapies and probably antidepressants, won’t be far behind. After all, there is already preliminary evidence that serotonin-enhancing antidepressants can alter normal personality traits like sociability, even in people without depression.

But even if pessimism could be “treated,” would that guarantee a longer life? Judging from recent research in depression, it may be no slam dunk. Efforts to decrease heart disease and mortality by treating depression have been disappointing. Two large randomized trials involving depressed heart-attack patients found no survival benefit in treating them with either cognitive behavior therapy or serotonin-enhancing antidepressants, though their depression did improve. (There is some debate about the findings.)

In the end, pessimists have enough to fret about without worrying that their own temperament will doom them to a short life. If pessimists should worry about anything, though, it’s that they may have an undiagnosed — and treatable — depression. Treating depression may not guarantee a longer life. But it will certainly make it a happier one.

Richard A. Friedman is is a professor of clinical psychiatry and the director of the Psychopharmacology Clinic at Weill Cornell Medical Center.

vendredi 26 janvier 2007

Why so many grads 'fail to launch'

Many 20-somethings find themselves moving home to live with Mom and Dad, just like the movie 'Failure to Launch.' Blame it on the inertia -- and some very real challenges.

By MP Dunleavey

At 24, Lorena Bravo would appear to be a card-carrying member of the so-called boomerang generation.

Despite being bright, articulate and well-educated (she has a bachelor's degree in psychology and a master's in teaching), Bravo couldn't find full-time work after she graduated. So she recently moved back home with her parents in a Los Angeles suburb.

But if you're thinking Bravo fits the model of "Failure to Launch" -- the new movie starring a Porsche-driving Matthew McConaughey, who loves living with his parents so much he won't leave -- you'd be wrong. She doesn't love living at home; she just doesn't see another option.

That makes her a poster child for a darker side of the boomerangers, many of whom graduate unprepared for the daunting financial realities that await them -- whether it's dealing with massive debt, a dicey job market, the high cost of living or, D, all of the above.

"It's a myth that 20-somethings don't want to get on with life, that they don't want to grow up," says Abby Wilner, co-author of "The Quarterlifer's Companion: How to Get on the Right Career Path, Control Your Finances, and Find the Support Network You Need to Thrive,” a book that aims to help recent grads get on their feet. "It's a choice to move home and often something they do out of financial necessity."

Rocky financial landscape

The transition from college to real life has never been easy. But today's young adults face an unprecedented number of financial hurdles.
  • Whether you're attending a pricey private college or a public one, college costs have nearly doubled in the last 20 years (and that's after adjusting for inflation).

  • The average student will graduate with about $15,500 in student loans, according to the College Board. And that's not including loans from parents, home-equity loans or credit-card debt.

  • About 25% of college students use credit cards to help pay tuition and fees

  • According to a 2004 survey by Nellie Mae, graduating students carry an average credit-card balance of nearly $3,000.

Years ago, a college grad could hope to land a good job to cover all these expenses, but it's no longer that simple. Increasingly, all that BA will get you is a service-sector job, says Elana Berkowitz, editor of Campus Progress, a division of the Center for American Progress.

Half the workers in restaurants, grocery stores and department-store chains are under 24, she notes.

"Time was, you could get an entry-level job and be able to pay your way," says Cathy Stocker, Wilner's co-author. "Now, even if you're lucky enough to get an entry-level job, many people can't pay their student loans and make rent."

Not surprisingly, a 2004 survey that Stocker and Wilner conducted found that 61% of college grads had lived at home between the ages of 21 and 25. More than half did so for more than a year.

Drowning in debt

Needless to say, this isn't part of the college student's game plan. "You go in believing that a BA is your ticket to the American dream," says Lorena Bravo. "But for most of us, college just didn't pan out the way we expected."

Bravo emerged from college in 2003 with $18,000 in student-loan debt. "That's nothing," she says, "I know people who graduated with $100,000 in debt. I was one of the lucky ones."

Still, she wasn't able to find a job that paid more than $20,000 a year, even with the degree and plenty of college work experience.

So after temping for a year, Bravo impulsively decided to get a master's degree in teaching -- in the hope that an advanced degree would be the ticket to a better life. Instead, she racked up another $70,000 in student debt and discovered she doesn't have the stomach to be an elementary-school teacher after all.

Now, living at home, Bravo says she knows dozens of young people who are doing the same thing, most of them struggling to save money, get a grip on debt or come up with some kind of viable career plan.

Bravo has decided to focus on her ballroom dancing skills -- she hopes to compete in a national competition this fall -- and become a professional dance teacher. "They can make $70 or $80 an hour," she says.

Lack of preparation

Nicole Relyea, 24, laughs pretty hard at the idea that anyone might believe 20-somethings move back home as a cushy exit ramp from life's pressures. "Right, right, it's much easier trying to live with your parents, looking over your shoulder all the time," she jokes.

The real problem, she says, is that college students need more preparation to deal with the drastic shifts that life demands of them after graduation, both financially and career-wise.

"You think, six months ago I had a great on-campus job and social life. Now, I'm living at home, I have two friends and no academic stimulation for the first time in 20 years -- sitting in the basement, surfing the Internet, looking for work," Relyea says. "It's like, wow, I was just studying the cultural history of aborigines and now I'm looking at jobs where the main duties are answering the phone and typing.' "

"How are you supposed to make that shift? It's really something nobody prepares you for."

Relyea herself struggled to find a job after graduating in 2004 with $15,000 in student loans. She moved back home to save money and, like Bravo, she temped for over a year. Last fall she finally landed a full-time position with a nonprofit in her hometown of Madison, Wis.

Still, her $26,000 salary barely covers rent, living expenses and $160 in monthly student-loan payments. She's also studying to get her certificate in massage therapy and is weighing graduate school.

"The graduate degree would be for me, because I like school," she says, "but the massage-therapy certification might be the most useful thing I have."

Real-life solutions

Because it's Hollywood, the parents in "Failure to Launch" can hire a sexy consultant (Sarah Jessica Parker) to help get their reluctant son to move out -- and give the audience a lot of laughs.

But "Quarterlifer's Companion" co-authors Abby Wilner and Cathy Stocker worry that the mooching-off-mom-and-dad stereotype is getting more attention than the real issue: Most new grads need some helping making a realistic financial plan. Here are some steps:

Put aside preconceptions

Parents may assume that colleges provide seniors with some kind of exit strategy, but that's not the case, says Relyea. "Nobody says, 'Okay, today we're going to learn how to write a cover letter.'"

There are on-campus career talks and seminars, of course, but harried seniors don't always realize the importance of making time for those, Relyea adds.

Provide senior orientation

Start by helping your adult children recognize that things are going to be different now and ask them questions.

Six months before graduation, for example, ask about credit-card and student-loan debt. "You don't want to stress them out," says Stocker, "but you can say, 'Let's make a game plan together.'"

Offer financial training wheels

Wilner and Stocker recommend that parents and 20-somethings take advantage of the fact that living at home can be a kinder, gentler financial learning environment.

New grads "can chip in with some of the monthly bills, so you get hang of bill paying," suggests Wilner. "This is also a good time to form a budget. Monitor your spending. Keep receipts. Get a realistic idea of what you spend and how to manage it."

Stocker adds that parents can encourage saving by offering to "match" a portion of whatever their 20-something socks away.

Discuss expectations on both sides

While everyone I spoke to for this article stressed that living with the folks can be a smart financial move, without a clear plan or a deadline for finding a job, the situation can backfire.

To prevent nest-induced inertia, "The Quarterlifer's Companion" offers a contract that helps both parties define the terms of shared living conditions, including how the new "roommate" is going to contribute to the household; what his or her goals are; and when he or she might move out.

Both parties review the contract every three months, say, to evaluate progress and make any needed adjustments.

Show, don't tell

While it may be tempting to push your 20-something toward a job ("Let me introduce you to my friend Marv in accounting"), allow your adult child to hold the job-hunting reins. But do provide the same kind of networking advice you might to a friend. Relyea says the most helpful thing her mother did was to take her to networking events and professional lunches, where eventually Relyea met a contact who led to her current job.


http://articles.moneycentral.msn.com/CollegeAndFamily/MoneyInYour20s/FailToLaunch.aspx?page=all
You know it's bad when even Animal Planet is reporting something like this...



Nov. 16, 2006 — Far fewer polar bears cubs are surviving off Alaska's northern coast than in years past, a federal government report released Wednesday has concluded.

The study of polar bears in the south Beaufort Sea, which spans the northern coasts of Alaska and western Canada, also found that adult males weigh less and have smaller skulls than those captured and measured two decades ago.

The study does not directly blame the changes on a decline in sea ice. However, fewer cubs and smaller males are consistent with other observations that suggest changes in sea ice may be adversely affecting polar bears, the study said.
advertisement
line

The study warns that the decline in cub survival and the smaller adult males are the same conditions that preceded a decline in the polar bears of western Hudson Bay, Canada, where the population dropped 22 percent in 17 years.

Advocates seeking protections for U.S. polar bears say the report proves their point.

"It's just another example of seeing all of the impacts that scientists have previously predicted coming to pass," said Kassie Siegel of the Center for Biological Diversity in Joshua Tree, Calif. Siegal is the lead author of the petition seeking to list polar bears as threatened under the Endangered Species Act.

"The Grim Reaper of global warming is now clearly killing polar bear cubs," said Deborah Williams, president of Alaska Conservation Solutions, an Anchorage-based group aimed at halting climate change. "This study should be interpreted as a cry from the North to reduce greenhouse gases."

The report stopped short of saying the Beaufort Sea polar bear population, one of two in Alaska, had declined.

However, "Significant changes in cub survival and physical stature must ultimately have population level effects," the report concluded.

The report estimates the Beaufort Sea polar bear population at 1,526, down from a previous estimate of 1,800 bears. That would be a 15 percent decline, but researchers said the current study used different methods of counting.

The Beaufort Sea bears is one of two Alaska stocks. The other is the Bering-Chukchi stock off Alaska's northwest coast, a population shared with Russia.

Polar bears are classified as marine mammals because they spend much of their lives on sea ice. The listing petition claims that polar bears are threatened because of drastic declines in ocean ice due to global warming. A decision by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service on listing America's polar bears as threatened is due next month.

Polar bears depend entirely on sea ice for survival, according to the USGS report. Warming has caused major changes and scientists foresee more melting.

"Because more profound declines in sea ice area and extent are predicted for these northern regions, continued monitoring and conservative management of the SBS (Southern Beaufort Sea) polar bear population is warranted," the report concluded.

Siegel said the effects of shrinking sea ice are occurring exactly as summarized by the scientists quoted in her group's listing petition.

"Only it's happening sooner than they thought," she said.

The USGS report compared data on cubs collected from 1990 through last spring to studies from 1967-89.

Females give birth in January and emerge from dens with new cubs in March or early April. Cubs typically accompany their mother for 2 to 3 years.

For polar bears measured during autumn months, the number of surviving cubs born that spring declined from a mean of .61 cubs per female to a mean of .25 cubs per female.

"This decline can only be explained by lower survival of cubs after den emergence," the report said.



Changes in the physical stature of polar bears, both body weight and skull size, appeared to parallel the decline in cub survival, the study said. The decline occurred even though bears measured in the latter study were older. The study called the decline significant.

"Such changes in physical stature may suggest different impacts of reduced summer sea ice on adult male and female polar bears," the study said.

In spring, adult males often forgo foraging opportunities and focus on finding females for mating, the study said. Entering the summer in relatively poorer nutritional shape, they may be more vulnerable to summer sea ice retreat, which can separate polar bears from the most productive foraging habit, the study said.
advertisement
line

Reduced foraging opportunity for adult females usually is first reflected in poorer survival of their young, the study said.

Several recent observed deaths were directly related to sea ice retreat or changes in food availability associated with sea ice retreat.

In autumn 2004, four polar bears drowned trying to swim from short and distant pack ice. During winter and spring 2004, researchers recorded evidence of three polar bears hunting, killing and eating other polar bears.

Last spring, three adult females and one yearling were found dead. Three of the bears had depleted their lipid stores, an indication they had starved. The fourth, one of the adult females, was largely scavenged, and cause of death could not be determined. However, her death was unusual, the study said, because prime-age females in the past have had high survival rates.

"These anecdotal observations, in combination with both the changes in survival of young and in physical stature reported here, suggest mechanisms by which a changing sea ice environment can affect polar bear demographics and the status of populations," the report said.
From NYT

Article reposted below:

December 1, 2006
Sex Abuse of Girls Is Stubborn Scourge in Africa
By SHARON LaFRANIERE

SAMBAVA, Madagascar — Thirty miles outside this down-at-the-heels seaside town, Justin Betombo tends his vanilla plants and cheers the local soccer team as if he had not a care in the world. And in fact, what was once his greatest worry has been almost magically lifted from his shoulders.

In the local prosecutor’s office, a file filled with accusations that he had sodomized his 9-year-old niece has vanished.

Mr. Betombo was arrested in 2003 after the girl, Kenia, said he had savagely assaulted her. The police obtained his confession, which he later recanted, and a doctor’s certificate that Kenia had been sexually violated, rendering her incontinent and anorexic. Twice they sent the case file to the prosecutor.

There matters ended. Mr. Betombo attended one hearing in the prosecutor’s office, but Kenia’s parents say they were not told about it. The records are nowhere to be found. And Mr. Betombo walked away a free man. Kenia’s parents, distressed by what they saw as a travesty of justice, asked that her name be published, hoping that her case would set an example.

Among sub-Saharan Africa’s children, such stories are disturbingly common. Even as this region races to adopt many of the developed world’s norms for children, including universal education and limits on child labor, one problem — child sexual abuse — remains stubbornly resistant to change.

In much of the continent, child advocates say, perpetrators are shielded by the traditionally low status of girls, a lingering view that sexual abuse should be dealt with privately, and justice systems that constitute obstacle courses for victims. Data is sparse and sexual violence is notoriously underreported. But South African police reports give an inkling of the sweep of child victimization. In the 12 months ending in March 2005, the police reported more than 22,000 cases of child rape. In contrast, England and Wales, with nine million more people than South Africa, reported just 13,300 rapes of women and girls in the most recent 12-month period.

“The prevalence of child rape in South Africa goes from really, really high to astronomically high,” said Dr. Rachel Jewkes, a specialist on sexual violence with South Africa’s Medical Research Council.

Africa is not unique in its high rates of abuse. While a survey of nine countries last year by the World Health Organization found the highest incidence of child sexual abuse in Namibia — more than one in five women there reported being sexually abused before age 15 — it also found frequent abuse in Peru, Japan and Brazil, among other nations. Relatives are frequent perpetrators in Africa, as in much of the world. But this continent’s children face added risks, especially at school. Half of Malawian schoolgirls surveyed in 2006 said male teachers or classmates had touched them in a sexual manner without their permission.

The number of abuse cases is rising in South Africa, Zimbabwe, Zambia, Uganda, Kenya, Sierra Leone and other African countries, statistics show. Whether that means more children are being victimized or more are coming forward — or both — is impossible to determine, experts say.

Researchers cite various reasons that abuse is so common: poverty, which makes it harder for parents to keep children safe; a legacy of violent, oppressed societies, and cultural mores that allow offenders to escape criminal punishment, often by marrying their victims or compensating their victims’ families.

But, ultimately, said Dr. Jewkes, of the Medical Research Council, the vast gap between the status of men and boys and that of women and girls explains much of the climate of relative tolerance. “If I had to put my finger on one overriding issue, it would be gender inequality,” she said.

Increasingly, African nations are openly acknowledging the problem, partly because AIDS has made children more likely to fall ill or die from sexual abuse. Campaigns against abuse are under way in Zimbabwe, Lesotho, Swaziland, Kenya, Sierra Leone and elsewhere.

The impact is apparent in Zimbabwe, where a child rights group estimates that at least 2,000 child rape victims have died of AIDS since 1998. “Literally for the first time in Zimbabwe’s history, child abuse is no longer a taboo subject,” said James Elder, a Unicef spokesman.

That said, the response is minuscule compared with the extent of abuse, said Pamela Shifman, a child protection specialist at Unicef headquarters in New York. “We see huge numbers of girls affected,” she said. “These crimes are still treated as the fault or the problem of the victim.”

South Africa is perhaps furthest along in developing the specialized courts, medical treatment and counseling that have long been standard fare in the West. But even there, Dr. Jewkes said, appalling police work — for example, not verifying the addresses of suspects and accusers — routinely dooms prosecutions.

Beyond that, said Joan van Niekerk, national coordinator of Childline, which runs South Africa’s child crisis hot lines, children regularly complain that coping with the criminal justice system is worse than the sexual abuse itself.

Like much of the region, Madagascar, an island of 18 million off Africa’s southeastern coast, is making headway, but still falls short of even South Africa’s low standard.

Since 2000, Unicef has set up 11 child-protection teams of doctors, educators and judges to inform the public about sex abuse and assist victims. Hassan Mouigni, who leads vice investigations at the main police station in Antananarivo, Madagascar’s capital of 1.4 million, sees some results. This year, he said, the station has investigated 95 cases, compared with 40 in all of 2003.

But medical and legal authorities say the vast majority of families still hew to a tradition of accepting payment from perpetrators. The few who press charges are plunged into a criminal justice process that Mr. Mouigni calls deeply frustrating.

He can offer victims who arrive at his station little more than an officer behind a typewriter — no counselors, no video cameras to record testimony, no toy-filled rooms or friendly intermediaries. Instead, girls as young as 5 are expected to confront their tormentors face to face. Perhaps most daunting, poor families must produce at least $15 to cover investigation costs like gloves and paper for medical exams.

That was nearly enough to deter Claudine Ravoniarisoa, who appeared at Mr. Mouigni’s station one recent Thursday with her 15-year-old daughter. Wringing her hands nonstop, the girl told officers that a neighbor had raped her while her mother was hospitalized. “He destroyed my life and my body,” she said.

But once her mother learned of the costs, she decided to identify the perpetrator only as “Mr. X.”

“I have no money to pursue this,” she protested, while an officer tried to persuade her to do so.

In another room, Domoima Rahamtanirima pressed a case against her brother-in-law in the molestation of her 5-year-old, Menja. For two weeks afterward, Mrs. Rahamtanirima said, the girl cried when she urinated.

Mrs. Rahamtanirima borrowed money for the required medical exam. Nothing was left to buy the medicine the doctor had prescribed for Menja. Her file complete, the little girl traipsed in her frilly white dress to a courthouse as packed with accusers, accused and their supporters as a New York subway station at rush hour. She waited four hours, then sat down at a table before them all and, in a tiny voice, identified her uncle, seated across from her, as her assailant.

“We had to do it,” said her mother, who said that everyone in her village knew about the case and asked that her daughter’s name and picture be used. “Everybody should be aware that things like this should not happen to children.”

A Quest for Redress

Kenia’s parents, Antoine and Joazandry Moravelo, are equally passionate about the need for justice for their daughter. But after four fruitless years, they have all but given up hope. Though her photograph and name have appeared in local newspapers, they say, no one has been held accountable.

Kenia, the sixth of eight children, moved in with her aunt and uncle Lydia and Justin Betombo at the age of 8 after they promised to educate her. Sharing child care is common in Africa, and the Betombos, who lived 45 minutes away, had more than the Moravelos: a car and a two-room, tree-shaded house with sheet metal walls instead of the Moravelos’ thatched-roof reed hut.

But Kenia said the house was no haven. She said, “my uncle showed me his penis whenever he had a chance, and I always ran away.” Her aunt’s stock response, she said, was, “Don’t talk about that.”

One night in mid-2002, when her aunt was out, Kenia said, her uncle summoned her to his bed. “Because I refused, he came over to my bed,” she said. Afterward, she said, he told her, “If you talk about what happened, I will kill you.” She said she told her aunt anyway, and was instructed to keep quiet. The physical consequences of the attack, however, were hard to hide.

Kenia lost control of her bowels, had to quit school and was increasingly homebound. For six months or more, her only treatment was from a traditional healer who told her to boil herbs and wash with them. Finally, emaciated and weak, Kenia approached a neighbor. “She said, ‘I am sick; I am sick,’ and she was crying,” said the neighbor, Suzanne Mboty, who knew Kenia’s parents.

Hours after the neighbor reached his village, Mr. Moravelo retrieved Kenia. “She was so thin, so thin, I couldn’t believe it,” he said. Her mother said Kenia could not even sit down. “I opened her bag, and I saw all her underwear full of feces,” she said. “I said, ‘My God, what is this?’ ”

Kenia refused to say. But at the local health clinic, the nurse held up scissors and threatened to operate if Kenia did not talk.

That began nearly four years of medical procedures for Kenia, including a colostomy, two operations to close it, and repeated hospitalizations for wasting, incontinence and anorexia. Her mother said she sometimes refuses to eat because defecation is painful. Medical reports indicate that the muscle controlling defecation has been largely destroyed and her anal canal is heavily scarred.

The family is rent: Kenia’s parents had to sell their rice field and move to Diego-Suarez in the north for her treatment. Most of their other children remained behind, in the care of elder siblings. Kenia, now 13, is temporarily in Antananarivo, where a doctor is trying to treat her with a special diet.

A surgeon who recently examined her said a full recovery was unlikely. The uncertainty preys on Kenia, her mother said. “Sometimes she tells me, ‘My body is hurting. I have so many problems. I don’t go to school. I just feel this sickness all around me,’ ” she said.

The family’s legal efforts have met even less success. Mr. Moravelo lodged a complaint with the cash-short police, but the officers had no car; he hired a taxi so they could pick up Mr. Betombo for questioning. Frightened and sobbing, Kenia confronted her uncle at the chaotic station.

Justice Subverted

Mr. Betombo and his wife denied Kenia’s account. But ultimately — after the police beat him, Mr. Betombo said — he signed a confession, was arrested and carted off to the prosecutor’s office in nearby Antalaha.

Kenia’s father said that was the last he heard until a few days later, when friends told him that Justin Betombo was “free and happy” back in his village.

Mr. Betombo said he had convinced the prosecutor that his confession was false. Kenia’s parents say they were never summoned to contradict him.

“I took this girl in as my daughter,” Mr. Betombo said. “I really can’t understand why they say that I could have done such an awful thing to her. I think they were jealous of me and they wanted to ruin my life.”

Sambava’s police department again sent the file to the prosecutor’s office months later. But Sophie Ramahakaraha, the prosecutor in charge, now says that she has no record or memory of it. Real instances of child rape are rare, she said. “Very often the parents are poor and they use this procedure to get money,” she said.

But to Daul Randriamalaza, a Sambava police inspector, there is no question about who was the victim here.

“I don’t want to talk about corruption here, but that is what could have happened in this case,” he said as prisoners watched from the station’s tiny cell.

“I have children myself. How can I be happy about this?”
Got $2,200? In this world, you're rich

[from 12/13/2006 MSN]

A global study reveals an overwhelming wealth gap, with the world's three richest people having more money than the poorest 48 nations combined.
By MarketWatch

The richest 2% of the world's population owns more than half of the world's household wealth.

You may believe you've heard this statistic before, but you haven't: For the first time, personal wealth -- not income -- has been measured around the world. The findings may be surprising, for what makes people "wealthy" across the world spectrum is a relatively low bar.

The research indicates that assets of just $2,200 per adult place a household in the top half of the world's wealthiest. To be among the richest 10% of adults in the world, just $61,000 in assets is needed. If you have more than $500,000, you're part of the richest 1%, the United Nations study says. Indeed, 37 million people now belong in that category.
Half live on less than $2 a day
Sure, you can now be proud that you're rich. But take a moment to think about it, and you'll probably come to realize that the meaning behind these numbers is harrowing. For if it takes just a couple of thousand dollars to qualify as rich in this world, imagine what it means to be poor.

Half the world, nearly 3 billion people, live on less than $2 a day. The three richest people in the world –- Microsoft Chairman Bill Gates, investor Warren Buffett and Mexican telecom mogul Carlos Slim Helú -- have more money than the poorest 48 nations combined.

Even relatively developed nations have low thresholds of per person capital. For example, people in India have per capita assets of $1,100. In Indonesia, capital amounts to $1,400 per person. The study's authors defined net worth as the value of people's physical and financial assets, less debts.

"In this respect, wealth represents the ownership of capital," the authors say. "Although capital is only one part of personal resources, it is widely believed to have a disproportionate impact on household well-being and economic success, and more broadly on economic development and growth."

That said, it's interesting to look at how those at different economic levels manage their capital.

Property, particularly land and farm assets, are more important in less developed countries because of the greater importance of agriculture and because financial institutions are immature.

The study also reveals the differences in the types of financial assets owned. Savings accounts are strongly featured in transition economies and some rich Asian countries, while stock and other types of financial products are more commonplace in Western nations.

The authors say there is a stronger preference for saving and liquidity in Asian countries because of lack of confidence in financial markets. That isn't so much the case in the United States and the United Kingdom, which have private pensions and more-developed financial markets, they say.
High incomes, negative net worth
Surprisingly, household debt is relatively unimportant in poor countries because, the study says, "while many poor people in poor countries are in debt, their debts are relatively small in total. This is mainly due to the absence of financial institutions that allow households to incur large mortgage and consumer debts, as is increasingly the situation in rich countries"

Meanwhile, "many people in high-income countries have negative net worth and -- somewhat paradoxically -- are among the poorest people in the world in terms of household wealth."

But let's not feel too bad about ourselves, even if we do have a negative savings rate. The average wealth in the United States is $144,000 per person. In Japan, it's $181,000. Overall, wealth is mostly concentrated in North America, Europe and high-income Asia-Pacific countries. People in these countries collectively hold almost 90% of total world wealth.

The world's total wealth is valuated at $125 trillion. Although North America has only 6% of the world's adult population, it accounts for 34% of household wealth.

So be grateful for where you live in the world; it directly correlates to how much you have. But don't bask in superiority: The fastest-growing population of wealthy people is in China.

Look out when this population transitions from saving to spending. It's going to dramatically change the composition of the world economy, and it may just help prevent the world from becoming more of an plutocracy than it already is.

This article was reported and written by Thomas Kostigen for MarketWatch.


THE WAY WE LIVE
Census Bureau says Americans love electronics and prefer the Internet to people -- also, young people are less idealistic, and S.F. is a really expensive place to call home

Patricia Yollin, Chronicle Staff Writer

Friday, December 15, 2006

It is, for better or worse, an American portrait.

Next year, adults and adolescents in the United States will spend almost five months -- 3,518 hours -- exploring the Internet, watching television, reading daily newspapers and listening to music on various personal devices. They'll invest an average of $937 on media (Seriously? Shit, not me).

One thing most of them will not be doing is reading the 999-page Statistical Abstract of the United States: 2007, the source of these tidbits.

Issued today by the U.S. Census Bureau, the 126th annual compendium of amazing facts and obscure details is not an easy read. The type is tiny, the tables of data endless. Somewhere in there, America is buried -- the habits, pastimes and future of its people.

Almost impenetrably thick, the report could keep trivia buffs, numbers fanatics and trend forecasters going for months. Government statistics coexist in the abstract with research by nonprofit organizations, private industry and international agencies.

One of the main findings predicts that Americans will be more electronically inclined -- or enslaved -- than ever in 2007 (K is rolling in his cell, I reckon).

They'll be parked in front of their TVs for 65 days and on the Internet for more than a week, according to projections from a communications industry forecast. They'll spend 41 days listening to radio.

Adults will invest an entire week in reading daily newspapers. Along with teenagers, they'll put in another week listening to recorded music. And they'll buy more than 3 billion books next year.

The report also found that 97 million adult Internet users looked for news online in 2005, 16 million used a social or professional networking site, and 13 million created a blog.

"The report is pretty accurate," said Gerald Celente, founder of the Trends Research Institute in Rhinebeck, N.Y. "People are more electronically connected and less humanly connected. There's an expression called PDA -- public displays of affection. They've even put that in techno jargon, and it's unacceptable. It's disconnecting people.

"This whole MySpace phenomenon -- 'I have 800 friends on MySpace,' " Celente said sarcastically. "They're not your friends. You don't know who these people are. It shows how far removed we are from what friendship is and what passion is. We're trying to make technology replace what we've lost humanly. We're getting more and more isolated and less and less human."

If the country's adults are electronic junkies, its younger residents are less idealistic than they used to be. In 1970, 79 percent of college freshmen wanted to discover "a meaningful philosophy of life," according to the abstract. Last year, 75 percent of those entering college said their main goal was "being very well off financially."

"Look at the role models they're following," Celente said. "Baby Boomers have become the biggest sellouts and hypocrites of any generation. They built the McMansions and bought the SUVs."

In terms of wealth, more than half of U.S. households owned stocks or mutual funds in 2005. Five years ago, more than a half-million of the nation's millionaires -- there were 3.5 million in 2001 -- lived in California. And 3,000 lived in Vermont. The average tax refund in 2003 was $2,154.

In San Francisco in 2005, the cost of living was higher than anywhere in the country except for Manhattan. The city also ranked third that year for number of overseas visitors, behind New York and Los Angeles.

The median sales price of an existing one-family home in the San Francisco metropolitan area was also steeper then than in other parts of the United States.

The report contains about 1,400 tables, with data ranging from how many trips people made to the emergency room to the number of crustaceans on the endangered species list.

A person who wades through all of them will come to a number of revealing, bizarre or pointless conclusions. For example: The retail price of a gallon of milk leapt to $3.24 in 2005 from $2.79 in 2000. Americans in 2004 drank lots of bottled water, more than 23 gallons per capita. Ninety-eight percent of their footwear was imported.

If you'd like your flight to arrive on time, fly to Cincinnati. If you're hoping for a punctual departure, leave from Salt Lake City. If you don't want to get killed or robbed, don't go to Cleveland. And if you're trying to hang on to your vehicle, avoid Detroit.

One unsurprising fact is that life is more expensive all the time. For a family of four in December 2000, the weekly cost of food on the "thrifty plan" was $88.40. Five years later, it had climbed to $102.50. At the other extreme, eating on the "liberal plan" jumped from $169.40 to $195.60 per week.

A few other morsels: There were 13,034,000 hunters in the United States in 2001 and 4,100,000 cheerleaders in 2004. And there were 8,035 certified organic growers in the country in 2003.

Finally, there is this: Last year, residents of 1.4 million homes said their neighborhoods smelled so bad that they wanted to move.

The Statistical Abstract costs $39 for the hardbound edition and $35 for the softbound edition. It can be ordered online at bookstore.gpo.gov.

The abstract is also available online for free at www.census.gov/compendia/statab/.
Fun facts about us

Americans will spend $55.5 billion to buy 3.17 billion books next year.

The nation had 3.5 million millionaires in 2001, 572,000 of them in California.

The average tax refund in 2003 was $2,154, up from $1,802 in 2000.

Consumers stepped into 2.1 billion pairs of imported shoes in 2004. More than 98 percent of footwear bought in the U.S. was imported.

Americans drank 23.2 gallons of bottled water per capita in 2004, up from only 2.7 gallons in 1980.

Pet owners walked an average of 1.6 dogs in 36 percent of U.S. households in 2001; people were tolerated by an average of 2.1 cats in 32 percent of homes.

Source: U.S. Census Bureau
Media watching

Consumers will spend $936.75 per person on media next year, according to projections by the communications industry.

65 days

Time adults will spend in front of TV in 2007

41 days

Time adults will spend listening to radio

1 week

Time adults will spend on the Internet

1 week

Time adults will spend reading newspapers

Among adults, 97 million sought news online in 2005, 92 million bought a product on the Web and 91 million

Page A - 1
URL: http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2006/12/15/MNGSBN09321.DTL

real sad stuff, but nothing new...



SEATTLE POST-INTELLIGENCER
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/business/295840_polleconomy14.html

Americans see rich-poor gap worsening

Thursday, December 14, 2006

By MATTHEW BENJAMIN
BLOOMBERG NEWS

Americans overwhelmingly say the growing gap between rich and poor has become a serious national concern, a sentiment that may bolster Democrats' plans to narrow the income divide when they take control of Congress.

Nearly three-quarters of Americans believe inequality is a major issue, versus 24 percent who don't think so, according to a new Bloomberg/Los Angeles Times poll. Most of the concern is among Democrats and independent voters, though a majority of Republicans -- 55 percent -- also called the situation serious.

"Income inequality is widening quite rapidly," said Alice Rivlin, a former vice chairwoman of the Federal Reserve who's now a public policy professor at Georgetown University in Washington. "It does matter to people that there are such unequal chances to get ahead."

A month after Republicans lost their majority in Congress, poll respondents generally expressed optimism about the economy, with about three in five saying it's doing well. They were divided over how effectively President Bush is managing the economy, with nearly half saying they approve of the job he's doing and about the same number saying they disapprove.

There's little concern about a housing-market collapse, with only 15 percent of respondents saying they expect home values in their neighborhoods to fall during the next six months. And while more than a third expect to spend less money on gifts this holiday season, 68 percent called their personal finances secure.

Still, anxiety about the growing rich-poor divide unites Americans, crossing income and political divisions. Among those earning less than $40,000 a year, 84 percent called the gap a serious problem, with more than half saying it's "very serious." Among those earning more than $100,000, more than three in five said it's a serious concern. Those in the middle-income group making between $40,000 and $60,000 were almost as concerned as the least wealthy.

"The ultrarich and the rich continue to have mechanisms to make money, like the stock market and executive salaries," Kevin Godsea, an employee with the Fish and Wildlife Service, said in a follow-up interview.

"And the wages of middle-class workers are stagnant," said Godsea, 30, a registered Republican in Fort Myers, Fla., who considers himself middle class.

Income growth has begun to pick up, with average hourly wages gaining 4.1 percent over the past 12 months, the biggest increase since February 2001. Still, Census Bureau data point to a long-term trend of the rich taking home a larger slice of U.S. income every year.

The portion of national income earned by the top 20 percent of households grew to 50.4 percent last year, up from 45.6 percent 20 years ago; the bottom 60 percent of U.S. households received 26.6 percent, down from 29.9 percent in 1985, according to the Census Bureau. Meanwhile, average pay for corporate chief executive officers rose to 369 times that of the average worker last year, said finance professor Kevin Murphy of the University of Southern California; that compares with 131 times in 1993 and 36 times in 1976.

"We are creating have and have-not classes in this country," said Jane Huntley, 77, a retired elementary school teacher from Brunswick, N.Y.

Democrats are considering proposals to shrink the income gap, such as boosting the minimum wage, scrutinizing executive pay, increasing tax credits available to the poor, and making health care and higher education more affordable.

Americans have become more optimistic about the state of the economy, with those saying it's doing well rising to 61 percent from 54 percent in September. That may reflect the drop in gasoline prices in the past several months and the burst of wage growth, analysts say.

About one in five of those surveyed said they expect to spend a lot less money on gifts this year. Nearly half said they will spend the same amount and only 15 percent said they plan to increase spending.

"It's time to be really, really careful with our money because the economy is overrated," said Francisco Garcia, 50, a computer systems architect in Houston and an independent voter. "With so many jobs that have been outsourced, the only thing I can compute is that a lot of people are just spending on credit cards, and that's going to cave in."

The poll of 1,489 adults was taken Dec. 8-11 and had a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 3 percentage points.

© 1998-2006 Seattle Post-Intelligencer

From BBC News

One in 20 Hispanics 'goes hungry'
Hispanic farmers work the field in Idaho (archive picture)
Hispanics face many hurdles to get access to nutritious food
Five per cent of Hispanics in the US regularly go hungry and as many as 20% do not have sufficient access to nutritious food, a US report says.

Poverty and lack of awareness about state entitlements are the causes, says the study by Hispanic civil rights group the National Council of La Raza.

Immigrants also face a series of linguistic, legal and cultural obstacles in accessing enough food.

Hispanics are the biggest single minority group in the United States.

The study showed that the number of Hispanics going hungry was significantly higher than for non-Hispanic whites (3%), but lower than the figure for non-Hispanic blacks (8%).

A similar number of Hispanics and non-Hispanic blacks suffered from a lack of access to healthy food, around four times more than non-Hispanic whites.

KEY STATISTICS
Going hungry:
Non-Hispanic blacks 8%
Hispanics 5%
Non-Hispanic whites 3%
Lacking healthy food:
Non-Hispanic blacks 22%
Hispanics 20%
Non-Hispanic whites 5%

"Lack of access to resources is forcing far too many Latino families into choices no-one should have to make, such as between having a roof over their heads or putting food on the table," said Janet Murguia, NCLR President and CEO.

"A lack of affordable, nutritious food also has devastating health consequences, such as increasing hunger and obesity, affecting not only the Latino community, but the well-being of our entire nation."

One of the authors of the study, Jennifer Ng'andu, said the Latino community was "practically invisible" when it came to the issues of hunger and malnutrition in the US.

url: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/6198007.stm

...ties back to my post about me having a perpetually full stomach...ah, satisfaction of gluttony...


Children growing up in California, fabled land of opportunity, have a worse chance of achieving the American Dream than children in most other states, a new study says.

The real Golden State is Virginia, where children are most likely to become well-educated adults with steady, high-paying jobs, according to researchers from the nonprofit Editorial Projects in Education Research Center in Washington, D.C.

Children born in New Mexico were deemed least likely to succeed.

The researchers stacked up all the states and the District of Columbia against 13 measures of success, ranging from parents' employment and English fluency to children's test scores and graduation rates.

California ranked 34th among the states and was below the national average in seven areas: percent of children whose parents work full-time, speak English, graduated from college, earn at least a middle-level income; percent of children proficient in reading and proficient in math; and percent of adults who work full time.

California had by far the nation's lowest percentage of children whose parents speak fluent English: 62 percent. The next lowest was 73 percent, in Texas. Nearly everyone's parents speak English in Virginia: 91 percent.

"The idea we're trying to get across is that education plays an important role, but success is not just about the years of formal schooling," said Christopher Swanson, director of the research center. "What happens in your schooling is strongly influenced by what happens in your early years."

In other words, your family's income and parents' English skills make a difference.

No surprise there.

Yet despite California children's relatively dim prospects, the state's high academic expectations apparently counterbalance many disadvantages they face.

What the new report highlights is that states can do a lot with a cohesive education system, Swanson said, and California is a case in point -- especially when compared with last-ranked New Mexico.

Children born in California and New Mexico start out similarly disadvantaged, the researchers say.

Consider these national averages: Nearly 43 percent of children nationwide have at least one parent with a college degree. About 70 percent have at least one parent working full time. About 84 percent have parents who speak fluent English. And about 60 percent come from families earning at least twice the poverty level, which is $20,000 for a family of four.

Both California and New Mexico fall below all of those averages by similar amounts. So it might be expected that children from those states would do about the same academically and on the job.

But the report shows that once children reach the age of 3, Californians are more likely than New Mexicans to attend preschool and kindergarten, learn math, graduate and go on to higher education, though reading proficiency remains a problem.

"The school years is where things start to turn around for California," Swanson said. "Its school system is not the most stellar in the country, but it's holding its own and working with an educational population that's fairly challenging -- language issues, and a high amount of poverty that's not present in other areas of the country."

Here is how California stands against top-ranked Virginia and bottom-ranked New Mexico on the 13 indicators of success:

-- Children whose parents earn at least a middle income: New Mexico, 45 percent; California, 58 percent; Virginia, 70 percent.

-- Children with at least one college grad parent: New Mexico, 34%; California, 37%; Virginia, 51%.

-- Children with at least one parent working full time: New Mexico, 65%; California, 68%; Virginia, 76%.

-- Children whose parents speak English: New Mexico, 80%; California, 62%; Virginia, 91%.

-- Preschool enrollment: New Mexico, 39%; California, 46%; Virginia, 47%.

-- Kindergarten enrollment: New Mexico, 74%; California, 78%; Virginia, 74%.

-- Eighth-graders proficient in math: New Mexico, 14%; California, 22%; Virginia, 33%.

-- Fourth-graders proficient in reading: New Mexico, 21%; California, 21%; Virginia, 37%.

-- High school graduation: New Mexico, 57%; California, 71%; Virginia, 75%.

-- Young adults enrolled in college or with a degree: New Mexico, 39%; California, 50%; Virginia, 50%.

-- Adults with a two- or four-year college degree: New Mexico, 34%; California, 39%; Virginia, 43%.

-- Adults with income at or above the national median: New Mexico, 43%; California, 54%; Virginia, 57%.

-- Adults with a full-time job: New Mexico, 65%; California, 65%; Virginia, 72%.

California and other states that adopted clear academic expectations at every grade level early on have improved academically over the years, despite low rankings in the current report, said Swanson, whose research center also publishes the respected Education Week newspaper.

California's academic expectations, adopted in the late 1990s, are widely acknowledged to be among the most rigorous in the nation.

Despite the new report's nod to California's efforts, Jack O'Connell, the state superintendent of schools, called it a "sobering look at the current state of education and other services for California's children."

On Wednesday, he called on "businesses, government and communities" to join educators in improving children's chances of success in the state.
To see the full report, called "From Cradle to Career" and published in Education Week, go to www.edweek.org/go/qc07.

E-mail Nanette Asimov at nasimov@sfchronicle.com.

Page A - 1
URL: http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2007/01/04/MNGHANCFMJ1.DTL

mercredi 24 janvier 2007

http://newsforums.bbc.co.uk/nol/thread.jspa?threadID=5351&&&edition=2&ttl=20070124205346
View of US's global role 'worse'
The view of the US's role in the world has deteriorated both internationally and domestically, a BBC poll suggests.

The World Service survey, conducted in 25 nations including the US, found that three in four respondents disapproved of how Washington had dealt with Iraq.

The majority of the 26,381 respondents also disapproved of the way five other foreign policy areas had been handled.

The poll, released ahead of President Bush's State of the Union speech, was conducted between November and January.

The number of those who said the US was a positive influence in the world fell in 18 nations polled in previous years.

In those countries, 29% of people said the US had a positive influence, down from 36% last year and 40% two years ago.

Across the 25 countries polled, 49% of respondents said the US played a mainly negative role in the world.

In Kenya, Nigeria, the Philippines and the US most of those polled said they thought America had a positive role.

But among Americans, the number of those who viewed their country's role positively fell to 57% - six percentage points down from last year and 14 percentage points down from two years ago.

Mid-East role

Respondents were also asked about the Bush administration's handling of six areas of foreign policy:

  • The war in Iraq: an average of 73% of respondents disapproved (57% in the US). Disapproval was strongest in Argentina and France, while people in Nigeria, Kenya and the Philippines were more likely to approve.

  • Detainees in Guantanamo: 67% disapproved (50% in the US). Backing for America on this issue was highest in Nigeria, where 49% approved.

  • Israeli-Hezbollah war: Washington's role met with approval from respondents in Nigeria and Philippines, but on average 65% disapproved across the 25 countries (50% in the US).

  • Iran's nuclear programme: again, support for US actions appeared strongest in Kenya (62%), Nigeria (53%) and the Philippines (52%). But, overall 60% of respondents disapproved (50% in the US).

  • Global warming: more than 80% of respondents in Argentina, France and Germany disapproved compared to 56% overall (54% in the US). But the White House had 50% or more support among those polled in Nigeria, Kenya, the Philippines and South Korea.

  • North Korea's nuclear programme: opposition to US policy was strongest among respondents in Argentina and Brazil. On average across the 25 countries 54% disapproved (43% in the US).

When asked about US military presence in the Middle East, an average of 68% of respondents across the 25 countries answered that it "provokes more conflict than it prevents".


SEE THE FULL SURVEY

Most computers will open this document automatically, but you may need Adobe Reader

In Nigeria, 49% of respondents said it was a "stabilising force", as did 41% in the Philippines, 40% in Kenya and 33% in the US.

The poll was conducted for the BBC World Service by GlobeScan and the Program on International Policy Attitudes (Pipa) at the University of Maryland. It has a margin of error ranging from +/-2.5% to +/-4%.

The questions were put to people in: Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Chile, China, Egypt, France, Germany, Great Britain, Hungary, India, Indonesia, Italy, Kenya, Lebanon, Mexico, Nigeria, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Russia, South Korea, Turkey, United Arab Emirates and the United States.

Polls Say Wealth Important to Youth
- By MARTHA IRVINE, AP National Writer
Monday, January 22, 2007

(01-22) 11:14 PST CHICAGO, (AP) --

Melissa Greenwood sees it every day at her high school — the hyper-focus on designer labels, the must-have trendy cell phones, the classmates driving SUVs.

You could say it's just teens being teens. But new polls show that the obsession with material things is growing — and that being rich is more important to today's young people than in the past.

UCLA's annual survey of college freshman, released last Friday, found that nearly three-quarters of those surveyed in 2006 thought it was essential or very important to be "very well-off financially." That compares with 62.5 percent who said the same in 1980 and 42 percent in 1966, the first year the survey was done.

Another recent poll from the Pew Research Center found that about 80 percent of 18- to 25-year-olds in this country see getting rich as a top life goal for their generation.

"It bothers me because I would like to think I am the opposite," says Greenwood, a 16-year-old high school junior from Arlington Heights, a well-off suburb outside Chicago. She tries to keep her own spending in check under the watchful eye of her parents.

But even she sometimes finds it difficult to avoid the urge to fit in.

"Let's face it," she says. "Honestly, what teenage girl doesn't want to look cute and have the latest accessories?"

Young Americans' obsession with material things recently caused talk show host Oprah Winfrey to vent her frustrations, when asked why she chose to build a school in South Africa instead of this country.

"If you ask the kids what they want or need, they will say an iPod or some sneakers," Winfrey told Newsweek, referring to visits with students in inner-city school. "In South Africa, they don't ask for money or toys. They ask for uniforms so they can go to school."

Indeed, researchers say materialism is an obsession that cuts across socio-economic lines for American youth.

"Our kids have absorbed the cultural values of more, easy, fast and fun," says David Walsh, a psychologist who heads the National Institute on Media and the Family in Minneapolis. He's also author of the new book, "NO: Why Kids — of All Ages — Need to Hear It and Ways Parents Can Say It."

As his book's title suggests, he believes parents have played an integral role in encouraging their children's materialism. His research found that, when adjusted for inflation, parents are spending 500 percent more money on kids today than just one generation earlier.

"A lot of parents have developed an allergic reaction to their kids being unhappy," he says.

Ann Fishman, a generational marketing consultant in New Orleans, also has found that baby boomer and Gen X parents are much more likely to spend money on their children than parents who lived through the Great Depression and World War II.

Today, she notes, young people are known for their collective billion-dollar spending power, much of it thanks to money they get from their parents.

"They have a different idea of what's necessary," Fishman says of young people. "For them, a cell phone is normal; an iPod is normal; a Game Boy is normal."

Some see the heightened expectations setting up inevitable disappointment.

"There are a lot of young people hitting 25 who are making, say, $35,000 a year, who expected they'd be millionaires or at least making six figures," says psychologist Jean Twenge. She's a professor at San Diego State University and author of "Generation Me: Why Today's Young Americans Are More Confident, Assertive, Entitled — and More Miserable Than Ever Before."

They're also entering adulthood with more college loans to credit cards debt.

No wonder, Twenge says, we hear so many 20somethings talking about the "quarter-life crisis."

"We're telling them they're special and they can do anything they want — and then they're growing up and finding out that's not true," Twenge says.

Tim Barello, a 24-year-old New Yorker, agrees that his generation has gotten caught up in wanting "more and more and more."

Having grown up on Long Island's wealthy North Shore, he thought he'd arrived when he got a job as a publicist and was able to rent an apartment in an exclusive apartment building in Manhattan.

"To be completely honest," he says, "I don't even appreciate everything I have sometimes.

"Yes, I have a nice apartment, a great job, a great degree, great clothing. But I feel empty inside rather often."

So he's changing his focus and this week, began classes at the American Academy for Dramatic Arts to pursue his dream of acting — even if it means giving up the cushy life.

"There is so much more to life," he says, "than materialistic possessions."

vendredi 19 janvier 2007

January 19, 2007
Deadly Wind and Rain Storm Sweeps Europe
By MARK LANDLER

FRANKFURT, Jan. 18 — A howling gale churned through the British Isles and Northern Europe on Thursday, killing at least nine people, uprooting trees, shattering windows, flooding beaches and forcing the cancellation of hundreds of flights at airports from London to Frankfurt.

The storm, called Kyrill by German meteorologists, generated pelting rain in Britain, Ireland, France, Belgium and the Netherlands. The fierce weather hampered efforts to rescue 26 sailors from a container ship they abandoned Thursday after it began listing in the English Channel.

It also prompted Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice to cut short a visit to Berlin, where she conferred with Chancellor Angela Merkel about the Middle East. Ms. Rice left an hour early for London to beat the weather; her plane made a bumpy landing there amid winds gusting to 80 miles per hour.

“This is the worst storm since 2002,” said Burkhard Kirsch, a meteorologist at the German Weather Service, noting that a gust of 123 m.p.h. had been recorded in the mountains of central Germany.

The name Kyrill stems from a German practice of naming weather systems. Anyone may name one, for a fee. Naming a high-pressure system costs $385, while low-pressure systems, which are more common, go for $256. Three siblings paid to name this system as a 65th birthday gift for their father, not knowing that it would grow into a fierce storm.

“We hope ourselves that we’ll get out of it lightly,” Rumen Genow, one of the three, told a northern German newspaper on Thursday.

In Britain, three motorists were killed in storm-related accidents, Reuters reported, while a woman died when a wall collapsed on her in heavy winds. Two people were killed in the Netherlands after an uprooted tree crushed their car, the Dutch news agency ANP reported. In Germany, two people, one of them 18 months old, were killed by flying debris. A motorist was killed when he crashed his car into another car while swerving to avoid a fallen tree, the police said. At nightfall, with the storm bearing down on Germany, the national railway suspended all long-distance service. At Heathrow Airport, outside London, airlines canceled 123 flights, while in Frankfurt, 122 flights were canceled.

“The wind conditions are not preventing the planes from taking off or landing, but the air traffic control authorities have increased the separation between the aircraft for safety reasons,” said Robert A. Payne, a spokesman for Fraport, which operates the Frankfurt airport.

French and British helicopters were sent to rescue 26 sailors in a lifeboat off southwestern England. They had abandoned their container ship, the MSC Napoli, after it was damaged and lost power, Bloomberg reported.

Two British Navy helicopters saved the sailors, but the fate of the ship was unclear. At Rotterdam, a container ship slipped its moorings and struck an oil jetty, leaking 10,000 barrels of fuel, Dutch news reports said.

Thom Shanker contributed reporting from London.

---

Burkhard Kirsch? I would like to find him and give him a hug on the premise of us being very distant relatives, but relatives all the same! I wonder who our common ancestor is?


lundi 15 janvier 2007

The New York Times

January 15, 2007
Anywhere the Eye Can See, It’s Likely to See an Ad
By LOUISE STORY

Add this to the endangered list: blank spaces.

Advertisers seem determined to fill every last one of them. Supermarket eggs have been stamped with the names of CBS television shows. Subway turnstiles bear messages from Geico auto insurance. Chinese food cartons promote Continental Airways. US Airways is selling ads on motion sickness bags. And the trays used in airport security lines have been hawking Rolodexes.

Marketers used to try their hardest to reach people at home, when they were watching TV or reading newspapers or magazines. But consumers’ viewing and reading habits are so scattershot now that many advertisers say the best way to reach time-pressed consumers is to try to catch their eye at literally every turn.

“We never know where the consumer is going to be at any point in time, so we have to find a way to be everywhere,” said Linda Kaplan Thaler, chief executive at the Kaplan Thaler Group, a New York ad agency. “Ubiquity is the new exclusivity.”

No consumer, it seems, is too young. Some school buses now play radio ads meant for children. Last summer, Walt Disney advertised its “Little Einsteins” DVDs for preschoolers on the paper liners of examination tables in 2,000 pediatricians’ offices, according to Supply Marketing, a company that gives doctors free supplies in exchange for using branded products.

Some people have had enough. Last month, after some “Got Milk?” billboards started emitting the odor of chocolate chip cookies at San Francisco bus stops, many people complained, and the city told the California Milk Processing Board to turn off the smell.

And this month the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey cancelled a plan to post ads for Geico at tollbooths and elsewhere around the George Washington Bridge, a deal that was valued at $3.2 million. Politicians and preservationists had raised aesthetic concerns, and some had complained the city was selling the ad space too inexpensively.

Yankelovich, a market research firm, estimates that a person living in a city 30 years ago saw up to 2,000 ad messages a day, compared with up to 5,000 today. About half the 4,110 people surveyed last spring by Yankelovich said they thought marketing and advertising today was out of control.

Some ad agencies and the companies that hire them are taking heed, calling the placement of ads everywhere a waste of money.

“What all marketers are dealing with is an absolute sensory overload,” said Gretchen Hofmann, executive vice president of marketing and sales at Universal Orlando Resort. The landscape is “overly saturated” as companies press harder to make their products stand out, she said.

Outright advertising is just one contributing factor. The feeling of ubiquity may also be fueled by spam e-mail messages and the increasing use of name-brand items in TV shows and movies, a trend known as product placement. Plus, companies are finding new ways to offer free services to people who agree to view their ads, particularly on the Internet or on cellphones.

More is on the horizon. Old-fashioned billboards are being converted to digital screens, which are considered the next big thing. They allow advertisers to change messages frequently from remote computers, timing their pitches to sales events or the hour of the day. People can expect to see more of them not only along highways, but also in stores, gyms, doctors’ offices and on the sides of buildings, marketing executives say.

The trend may lead to more showdowns as civic pride is affronted. “They’re making our community look like Las Vegas,” said Barbara Thomason, president of the Houston Northwest Chamber of Commerce, of the scores of digital signs she has noticed popping up in the last few years. “The word ‘trashy’ has been used.”

Some advertising executives say that as long as an advertisement is entertaining, people do not necessarily mind the intrusion — and may even welcome it.

In some office buildings, for instance, video screens in elevators provide news and information as well as ads. This year video screens will be placed in about 5,000 New York City taxicabs, where passengers will see both advertisements and NBC programs, according to Clear Channel Outdoor, which is installing the screens.

“If you do it the right way, you actually win points,” said John McNeil, executive creative director at McCann Worldgroup San Francisco. His agency designed ads for Microsoft that appeared on tray tables in US Airways planes last spring.

But advertisers are still trying to determine exactly what the right way is, and that has led to some intriguing experiments.

At the Amway Arena in Orlando, Fla., for instance, an interactive floor display for McDonald’s last year showed the head of a teenage boy with small Big Mac burgers flying past; when people stepped on the ad, the burgers bounced away from their feet.

An interactive ad for Adidas appears in the Herald Square subway station in New York City. Passers-by last week said they liked the sign, which looked like a static picture of a sneaker until someone walked past it, triggering a motion sensor that sent a spray of miniature sneakers flying.

“It makes me interested in the sneakers,” said Roscoe Evans, 36, a personal trainer from Waterbury, Conn. “I’d rather have it in here than out on the street.”

Andrea Mendez and Julie Wheaton, both working in New York for a year for Teach for America, said the sign was “cool” and suitable for its location. “But I wouldn’t want to see it back in Spokane,” said Ms. Wheaton, who is from the state of Washington.

Toyota projected ads for its Scion cars on the sides of buildings in 14 cities, including Chicago, Atlanta and Dallas. Unilever also projected ads, for its Axe men’s fragrance, on buildings in places like Tampa and Milwaukee. But this tactic does not always go over well: last month, when branches of Chase Bank and Commerce Bank projected ads on New York sidewalks, the city told the banks to turn off the unauthorized beams.

Ad executives say that new forms of advertising take trial and error.

“No one wants to annoy the consumer,” said Bill Bean, director of trade insight at Miller Brewing Company. “However, there are many annoying ads that sell products, and it’s very difficult to tell what annoys one consumer and what pleases another.”

Advertisers may not be able to get their logos everywhere. For instance, while companies like Verizon and Continental Airlines seem to have had success in giving out free (or inexpensive) boxes to pizzerias, some stores say they do not want the branded merchandise.

“It would offend as many of our customers, and could cost us as much business as the money we’d save by having free boxes,” said Kevin Behnke, general manager of Cosmo’s Pizza in Boulder, Colo. “Boulder’s kind of anti-commercial.”

Connie Garrido, president of the WOW Factory, an ad agency, said that advertisers took risks when they put messages in offbeat places, but that such risks could often be worthwhile. A campaign that reaches people outside their homes is “very good for awareness because it’s out there, it’s in your face, and you can blanket a marketplace,” she said. “It’s one of the last mass mediums.”

Revenue from these new and unusual ads is still small and hard to measure. The “alternative media” category represented $387 million in spending in the United States last year, up from $24 million in 2000, according to PQ Media, a research firm. But the 2006 figure still represented a tiny part of out-of-home advertising, which generated $6.8 billion that year, according to figures PQ Media compiled for the private equity firm Veronis Suhler Stevenson.

“If you reach consumers out of the house, they’re more likely to act than if they’re sitting on their couches,” said Jack Sullivan, senior vice president and out-of-home media director at Starcom USA, an advertising agency.

One company that says that nontraditional advertising has worked is Perry Ellis, the clothing designer, which gave 594,000 free shirt boxes and hanging bags to dry cleaners in New York, Miami, Los Angeles and San Francisco last year. Perry Ellis still gets phone calls from the laundries asking for more bags, said Pablo de Echevarria, senior vice president of marketing.

“We’re always looking for new mediums and places that have not been used before — it’s an effort to get over the clutter,” Mr. de Echevarria said.

“But,” he added, “I guess we end up creating more clutter.”

Home

* World
* U.S.
* N.Y. / Region
* Business
* Technology
* Science
* Health
* Sports
* Opinion
* Arts
* Style
* Travel
* Jobs
* Real Estate
* Automobiles
* Back to Top

Copyright 2007 The New York Times Company

* Privacy Policy
* Search
* Corrections
* RSS
* First Look
* Help
* Contact Us
* Work for Us
* Site Map